Sonication versus vortexing of implants for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection

J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Feb;51(2):591-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02482-12. Epub 2012 Nov 7.

Abstract

Biofilm removal efficacy of vortexing alone was compared with the standard vortexing-sonication procedure. Among 135 removed prostheses, 35 were diagnosed with infection and 100 with aseptic failure. At a cutoff of ≥ 50 CFU/ml, sonication was more sensitive than vortexing (60% versus 40%, P = 0.151), while the specificity was 99% for both methods.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthritis, Infectious / diagnosis*
  • Arthritis, Infectious / microbiology
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement / adverse effects*
  • Bacterial Load / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / diagnosis*
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / microbiology
  • Sonication*